I wrote! Reader NotesGo to section
The photo of a student at Siglo 21 University celebrating his graduation went viral . Representing a murdered woman , she was wrapped in film wrap and a rope around her neck. This is Tomás Vidal, a graduate of Private University. He held a poster using inclusive language to name his degree “ Licenade ,” and above it said, “Guilt wasn't mine.” On his neck, he wore the green scarf . The photo is completed with their fellow rugby club and university, who support and encourage, with every significant element they carried. This ritual ridicules feminist struggle, but, above all, it celebrates femicides . It welcomes transfemicides, clandestine abortion deaths, rape, abuse and patriarchal complicities in times of the green tide.
The mass repudiation mobilized the University to manifest itself, implementing an institutional sanction. The sanction: the graduate must redo his/her thesis and take a subject on gender in the institution. The rugby club to which it belongs expressed its repudiation in a statement. A prosecutor started an assessment to analyze whether it may be in contravention of the Coexistence Code . Complicities and support, minimization or naturalization of what happened are also viral.
It hits us to learn that new women are murdered , beaten, raped, in a chain of daily and permanent violence. The figures for femicides and transfemicides do not decrease . Reports of sexual abuse do not diminish, nor are patriarchal impunity . Violence towards women and feminized identities is in homes, in the streets, in the workspaces, in bonds, in institutions, in educational spaces.
How can we resist this photo that celebrates our murders? How to accommodate any sense about the disqualifying use of our symbols of struggle as feminists and dissidents? Understand that these masculinities still mock, ridicule and celebrate femicides , transfemicides and rapes? How to think about any possible link between holding a graduation of a graduate with killing and raping?
Historically, mockery and joke have been an effective way to reproduce gender oppressions and inequalities . Setting up spaces, realities, looks, words and acts to sustain this sexist society.
In Mexico, a group of footballers parodied “Un rapador en tu camino” in the locker rooms, after a match. On social networks, celebratory expressions of the mockery of the performance of Chilean women Las Teses circulated . Comments that support the idea that feminists will be left alone with these types of messages or that we carry a flag of exaggeration.
Who celebrates these comments in the networks and in life? Who megusteered the pictures of this young man? What fraternal covenants still hold these expressions ? And we're not just talking about the graduate student. It would be a partial reading only to stay in that individuality of the graduate that is a symptom , the tip of a thread that encourages us to expand and complexize the gaze.
It is an environment that created the idea , which thought each of the elements to carry, that explored the ridicule of each of the symbols. It is the people who did not say anything, who held the “joke”, who applauded, laughed, remained silent. What do you want to show with that message that engages a string of hateful and disqualifying expressions ?
It is one and many institutions that do not prioritize the implementation of gender policies in their curriculum content and coexistence codes. Even today, the gender perspective is partial and voluntary in many educational spaces. What education are we promoting and which society do we pay with it? What becomes urgent in educational institutions, to warn and work on these sexist expressions? How can an institution generate a basic transformation and not rest on the sobering gesture of an isolated student? How much can schools and universities promote clues for these masculinity mandates ?
Integral Sex Education in all educational spaces. Cross-cutting gender policies, protocols for action against gender-based violence. Specific budgets and effective compliance with the Micaela Law. All these measures are an outstanding debt that institutions have to society .
And now? What do we do with the debates that this episode triggered, when it stops being news? What do we do after social and institutional convictions? How do we run from the individuality of this student, from this fact that he enunciates hateful expressions, to take a real dimension of what is at the bottom?
SOURCE: La Tinta
Publication Date: 23/12/2019
Te sugerimos continuar leyendo las siguientes notas:
There are not comments
Every week, Patrizia Camponovo will bring us her yoga classes and different techniques to bring well...
In just 70 days of 2021, we are missing 7 Cordovan women who were bloody murdered by the hands of vi...
The young Gina Antonella Tonicelli began her doctoral studies in biology on seaweed from Piedras Col...
Romina Carranza is a biomedical engineer and created a device for non-seers: a haptic plan of the pr...